I recently completed the HPE CPP 2025 interview process. There were three rounds: Technical, Managerial, and HR. In the technical round, there were no real technical questions. They only asked a few basic behavioural questions and some things about what we did in the CPP program. It honestly didn’t feel like a technical evaluation at all. The managerial round was a bit better. The interviewer seemed more experienced and actually had a technical background. He asked me what excites me most and what I focus on. I said large-scale systems. Then he asked a few general questions about how I would handle certain situations and how I approach problem-solving. The HR round was straightforward, primarily focused on onboarding and salary details. My honest opinion: The whole process felt silly and unfair. It looked like the prioritised diversity over actual technical skills. The evaluation didn’t reflect real ability. I know I performed better than some people who got selected, but they seemed to care more about diversity categories than merit. If you don’t fall under a diversity category, it’s more about luck than skill in this process. Most importantly your contributions to the project wont matter in the intervierw porcess as i am the only person who did the whole project but a person who just wanted to complete and get rid of this project got selected my suggestion is that dont ever involve your self too much as that may hurt you more.

The interview went smoothly, with a range of technical questions tailored to the language. This facilitated an in-depth discussion, enabling exploration of nuances and showcasing expertise in the specific linguistic domain.