Perguntas de entrevista da SAIC

There was only one interview for my position. It was a phone interview with a group of interviewers and they just asked questions about my experiences and my resume. No technical questions were asked.

Communications great. Moved very fast. Interviewed with a great group of guys. Super friendly and knowledgeable. However description of software architecture was a bit rough around the edges and incoherent. Job description skill set didn’t quite match up with description of technology stack. Great group of guys, but just guys, no opposite sex. I lost interest in the position not too far from the start of interview. Just wasn’t a fit. Great people for sure!

Automated phone screen asking to describe yourself, qualifications, and why you would be a good fit due the applied job. This was a bit impersonal but I believe it’s intended as a screening mechanism.

Arranging the data using different types of tools given by the management to produce the output so it can be done eaisly and package details are discussed and after finishing the process the offer letter is sent to mail

- Basic HR screening - First interview with a peer. Basic behavioral questions. Interviewer was professional and listened. - Second interview was supposed to be with 3 people (two peers and hiring manager). Only one peer showed up who wasn't expecting to be alone. Then he said ok lets just "wing it". He then asked a couple of question asking to describe "weird situations" that you have faced. He then didn't like the answer because the situation was too weird for his taste and he would personally refuse to face that situation. So he ended the interview in half the time.

Screening with recruiter was just okay, they could have been more thorough. The second interview with who ended up being my direct manager was well prepped with relevant questions but also a very two way conversation with good details.

Not bad but we have to be careful while ans the questions they asked for and tell good answer for every questions they asked in the interview the process is quite simple you have to know what is what

Hostile Style... It is worth mentioning that as their recruiter came to me they had my general up on job boards resume. Ether it was all the typical call-center power plays; Or there is a vast disconnect between what the recruiter had been sent to find, and what the hiring manage was actually looking for. Initial and longest portion about first 10 min stressed/lectured that this 0-1 year experience listing was actually looking for an intermediate level candidate. Next stage attacked certifications. Primary over having the certification for the employment level I aspire to (iat 2) not the one I'm at. As well some general posturing over "presuming much about their business" after the off hand remark describing my more fringe license not likely being valued. Then a little bit of a side tangent on if i had applied for other places based on my more fringe license, and disbelief that no one values it... Caped off with some brief general contempt for my listed work history, and flack for only listing the most recent 5-6 year period. Then we started getting into the actual job description and the metrics. I called it there as the metrics made it sound worthless as far as skill advancement goes. About 15-20 min in total interview time. The final description was "essentially systems admin," but voice only caveat. It would only be walking the user through how to do it . Target metric was 100 call per shift, or just under 5min average per call.

Straight forward, professional and friendly. They asked me the questions I was expecting and the process went quickly. I appreciated the interviewer's tact and demeanor. There weren't any curve ball questions and the interviewer made it clear what the next steps would be.

Unprofessional interviewers. Interrupted during question responses then got irritated when I asked for clarification. The interruptions had nothing to do with the current question but previous answers even though I asked if I answered the question fully for them.