La entrevista consistió en tres etapas, primero fue una video llamada con su representante de recursos humanos. Muy amable y simpática me pregunto sobre mis intereses y conocimientos muy ameno todo. La segunda etapa fue un coding challenge onsite, me evaluaron usando un ejercicio de Hackerrank, la dificultad estaba bien pero el tiempo me pareció acotado. Luego ese mismo día me entrevisto uno de los lideres de proyecto, la entrevista fue mas técnica y mas extensa que la primera pero el enfoque similar me pregunto mis inquietudes y mis conocimientos a cambio también me contó a que se dedican en la empresa y lo que esperan de un pasante.

I was asked to go onsite for the intern interview. The university recruiting took a day, and around 30 students. No tech questions(are you kidding me?). They spent most of the time to split the students into groups to do group exercises. And check if you talk a lot during the process. They also assign you to different groups and ask you to do presentations on your imaginary products. Then the interviewer asked you questions about your products. One of the interviewer focused on that our product may not make customer happy.. OMG I am not here for sales positions. I am very curious what the hell are they doing, how can they come out such stupid onsite activities for a software engineer major student. I have other interviews with Google, Facebook, so that day looks like a waste of time. If the HR or hiring manager could see my post, I just want to ask one thing: you ask nothing about tech questions for a CS major student, but focusing on all other group stupid things, so are you wanting to hire a person that talks a lot but knows little about coding?!!!!! Before interview, I have a good impression about this company, after the interview, I feel very disappointment and I don't think it's a place for anyone that has passion in technology.