Current employee at GLI - Avaliação de funcionários no cargo de Content Strategist na empresa Go Local Interactive

3,0
14 de nov. de 2024
Recomenda
Visão de mercado da empresa

Prós

WFH flexibility, fun culture, great medical insurance and 15 paid holidays

Contras

low pay, owners did a poot job in scaling, some operational issues and at one point there was high turnover but that has gotten better.

Confira outras avaliações da empresa Go Local Interactive

5,0
9 de jun. de 2026
Recomenda
Visão de mercado da empresa

Prós

Good culture and structure where they make it clear what you need to do to be successful

Contras

Food options are horrible and the sales team takes all the gum

1,0
28 de mai. de 2026
Recomenda
Visão de mercado da empresa

Prós

Some of the employees are true gems that will help you improve and be a better human.

Contras

I worked here for several years and left with mixed feelings. There are genuinely talented people at this company, but structural and leadership issues held it back in meaningful ways. Direct management was often ineffective and difficult to work with. Compensation increases were consistently underwhelming, and it became clear over time that meaningful pay bumps were reserved for those in favor with leadership, frequently disguised as title changes rather than real advancement. The CEO's fixation on in-office presence over actual results signaled a fundamental distrust of employees and reflected a broader culture that prioritized optics over outcomes. The sales team operated with too little oversight, which created persistent friction with other departments. Go Local has a tendency to reward difficult client behavior rather than address it, which only encouraged more of it. This made not only the day to day, but also evenings for the poor souls who had to manage the fallout. Product development was too heavily influenced by individual client requests rather than a coherent long-term vision. The web department and leadership has a habit of chasing new projects and features before stabilizing what already exists. This spreads the team thin. Low performers were given far too many chances, with some able to coast without consequence for extended periods. This eroded morale for those carrying the weight and sent the wrong message about what was expected.

6
Filtrar avaliações por: Útil|Classificação|Data|Tudo