decent place - Avaliação de funcionários no cargo de Consultant na empresa RCH Solutions

2,0
6 de set. de 2021
Recomenda
Visão de mercado da empresa

Prós

small flat org specialized R&D IT work nice CEO

Contras

staffing company uncompetitive comp + benefits (no 401k match, high insurance premiums) small project pipeline

avatar
Resposta da empresa RCH Solutions
4y
Thank you for your feedback. I’d be happy to discuss your specific experience in more detail if you’re interested. In the meantime, I’d like to clarify a few points. Since the inception of our 401k program, RCH has provided a company match regardless of employee contribution. Additionally, we regularly assess our compensation and benefit options to ensure they both align with industry standards and help attract top team members. Just this year, we introduced a new parental leave policy and increased paid vacation time available. RCH is growing rapidly. In fact, we’ve doubled in size over the past two years thanks to our excellent reputation and robust and growing customer and services pipelines. We’ll continue to leverage our growth to enhance the experience we offer RCH employees and customers. Thank you again for sharing your perspective. - Michael Riener, CEO

Confira outras avaliações da empresa RCH Solutions

5,0
7 de abr. de 2025
Recomenda
Visão de mercado da empresa

Prós

Great team with a great managers

Contras

Pay is a bit low and not according to market value

2,0
28 de jan. de 2026
Recomenda
Visão de mercado da empresa

Prós

Exposure to the Bio-IT industry with opportunities to learn terminology and client projects Small company structure can allow for collaboration across teams Some team members are knowledgeable and technically strong

Contras

Management at both the middle and upper levels appeared unprepared to hire for entry-level or junior roles, with unrealistic expectations and limited willingness to train or mentor. Leadership did not align with the company’s stated values of being a close-knit, team-oriented, people-first organization. Little to no constructive feedback, proactive coaching, or professional development was provided. Feedback was consistently negative or vague rather than actionable. Requests for guidance or clarification were often met with criticism instead of support. Work was frequently taken over rather than explained. Communication was often passive-aggressive, with an expectation to infer direction instead of being given clear instructions. Performance tracking and reporting lacked transparency and accuracy, and was later used without collaborative review.

Filtrar avaliações por: Útil|Classificação|Data|Tudo