Balance Pros & Cons - Avaliação de funcionários no cargo de Senior Public Affairs Officer na empresa RICS

3,0
25 de nov. de 2022
Recomenda
Visão de mercado da empresa

Prós

Nice colleagues, respect of balance professional/private life.

Contras

Permanent restructuring, unclear/incoherent management from the Direction.

avatar
Resposta da empresa RICS
3y
Thank you for taking the time to write a review and for your positive comments about the colleagues you worked with and the work/life balance you were able to have. The independent review led by Lord Bichard earlier this year is already initiating change internally and is an important moment for the profession we support. You can view the Bichard RICS roadmap setting out key milestones for 2023 which will strengthen our purpose and strategy: https://www.rics.org/north-america/about-rics/corporate-governance/the-bichard-rics-review/

Confira outras avaliações da empresa RICS

4,0
19 de out. de 2021
Recomenda
Visão de mercado da empresa

Prós

Flexible Remote work Non problematic Colleagues and managers were kind and helpful

Contras

UK team would take their time to respond to our regional team delaying our time management and projects Not very easy to grow in the company

4
avatar
Resposta da empresa RICS
4y
Thank you for your feedback about your time and RICS and your appreciation of our flexible working policy as well as the kindness shown by colleagues and managers alike. We welcome all feedback from former and current employees so we can grow together and face new challenges successfully. We are committed to driving positive changes and we have already taken a number of measures responding to feedback and recommendations to help us achieve this.
2,0
6 de ago. de 2014
Funcionário(a) sigiloso(a)
Recomenda
Visão de mercado da empresa

Prós

Exposure to high level professionals in the property profession, annual professional development course, and good benefits package.

Contras

The local office leadership is lacking in a way that is detrimental to the success of the organization. There's a lack of direction, death by meetings - which usually ends with no further action being taken, the Managing Director's ego is inflated and he has yet to deliver on annual membership acquisition goals, male-centric US office environment, blatant bias, and a lack of transparency. Management is secretive and shady. Outdated software and poor technical support.

5
Filtrar avaliações por: Útil|Classificação|Data|Tudo