Poor salary, poor benefits, no bonus, poor management - Avaliação de funcionários no cargo de Funcionário(a) sigiloso(a) na empresa RICS

1,0
19 de jul. de 2023
Funcionário(a) sigiloso(a)
Recomenda
Visão de mercado da empresa

Prós

•Great colleagues •Great co working space and location •Flexible working arrangements

Contras

•Very poor compensation - way below market value over the years •No bonus, poor benefits •After the matrix, global but major huge breakdown in working culture and communication - became quite toxic •senior management unable to handle the internal gaps and not business effective, poor leadership •no work progression, mundane •awful treatment of staff - senior leader in APAC, shouting, emotional abusive, threatening/bullying, bias, hence high turn over staff but no actions taken

Confira outras avaliações da empresa RICS

4,0
19 de out. de 2021
Recomenda
Visão de mercado da empresa

Prós

Flexible Remote work Non problematic Colleagues and managers were kind and helpful

Contras

UK team would take their time to respond to our regional team delaying our time management and projects Not very easy to grow in the company

4
avatar
Resposta da empresa RICS
4y
Thank you for your feedback about your time and RICS and your appreciation of our flexible working policy as well as the kindness shown by colleagues and managers alike. We welcome all feedback from former and current employees so we can grow together and face new challenges successfully. We are committed to driving positive changes and we have already taken a number of measures responding to feedback and recommendations to help us achieve this.
2,0
6 de ago. de 2014
Funcionário(a) sigiloso(a)
Recomenda
Visão de mercado da empresa

Prós

Exposure to high level professionals in the property profession, annual professional development course, and good benefits package.

Contras

The local office leadership is lacking in a way that is detrimental to the success of the organization. There's a lack of direction, death by meetings - which usually ends with no further action being taken, the Managing Director's ego is inflated and he has yet to deliver on annual membership acquisition goals, male-centric US office environment, blatant bias, and a lack of transparency. Management is secretive and shady. Outdated software and poor technical support.

5
Filtrar avaliações por: Útil|Classificação|Data|Tudo