While I was there the company was booming in revenue, and they were growing fast and hiring fast. But they seemed more focused on new sources of revenue and marketing than on improving the state of the art of their core product (which in hindsight is in line with their choice of CEO), and this seemed to reflect on the quality and intentions of the hires. In my department I was surrounded by people that were more interested in playing games of politics for their own individual benefit than actually create value, their vector to the top was more important than allowing value in, even if it meant firing people that could have brought tremendous value. It's no surprise to me that their tools are years behind their main competitor.
