The hiring process was extremely lengthy and time-intensive: phone screen, multiple interviews, a written exercise, reference checks, and even a background check. After all of this, I received only a generic rejection template email. The process lacked transparency. During my final interview, I was told reference checks would be the next step, which gave the impression I was close to an offer. It was disappointing to learn other candidates were still in the running. Twice during interviews, the primary supervisor I would have reported to did not show up in person, which raised questions about team alignment and respect for candidates’ time. Feedback was not offered, even after requests—despite the significant investment of time and effort from candidates. Advice to Management: If you expect applicants to complete multiple interviews, a take-home assignment, and provide references/background checks, there should be clearer communication about the process and where a candidate truly stands. Even brief, specific feedback would go a long way toward showing respect for candidates’ time and building trust in the organization’s hiring practices.