Solid, secure job with a proven company - Avaliação de funcionários no cargo de Mechanical Design Engineer na empresa PACCAR

4,0
20 de nov. de 2014
Recomenda
Visão de mercado da empresa

Prós

Work hard, and it'll be pretty difficult to lose your job. PACCAR take care of their employees. I had two supervisors during my nearly five years there, and both were excellent. They were mentors and guides more than supervisors. I know bad supervisors existed, but I believe this is the exception rather than the rule. They still have a pension, so far as I know (vested at five years). Seventy-four or whatever STRAIGHT consecutive years of profit can't be argued with. They have a good employee review process; I never had to ASK for a raise, they were already on top of it.

Contras

PACCAR are not afraid to cut the fat when they have to, but don't be the fat and GENERALLY you won't have a problem. If an old-fashioned conservative company (nice dress, no shenanigans, etc...) isn't for you, this probably isn't your company. There are definitely a fair amount of old and cranky people who have been there a few years too long and hate anything new and different. I can't speak to the new CEO, but Mark Piggott was pretty darn successful by most metrics.

Confira outras avaliações da empresa PACCAR

5,0
18 de dez. de 2025
Recomenda
Visão de mercado da empresa

Prós

Muitas oportunidades dentro da organização.

Contras

Menos oportunidades para horários de trabalho flexíveis.

1,0
15 de abr. de 2026
Recomenda
Visão de mercado da empresa

Prós

Not much, if you want a place that's okay with mediocrity, then welcome.

Contras

They blindly follow industry trends not industry standards. We have an initiative to use AI to increase productivity, without a proper plan, without security in mind and lack of general understanding. Consistently understaffed, for example there are teams or parts if teams that have max 4 developer type roles with 36 apps or APIs to support - this has lead to inconsistent code and effort as employees are spread too thin to be able to deliver quality work. Management refuses to take responsibility for issues that arise from being understaffed. Teams are not consistent in what tools and pipelines are used causing even more confusion and delays. Double standards: they don't want to properly promote or give raises to hard workers. Upper management made it clear to direct managers that "meets expectations" was a fine thing to give... To employees doing more than their fair share of work and are doing work outside of their role since they have no one else to do it do to being understaffed.

3
Filtrar avaliações por: Útil|Classificação|Data|Tudo