I had a very frustrating experience with this company’s hiring process.
The process involved four interview rounds and a fairly extensive technical assessment. I spent a significant amount of time working on the assignment, including late nights designing and presenting a detailed automated embording solution. As part of the process, I created a Loom demo explaining the system architecture, implementation approach, and design decisions in depth.
After submitting everything and walking through the solution during interviews, I never received any update or feedback about the outcome of my application.
What made this particularly disappointing is that I could see my Loom demo being viewed multiple times (9 views). This indicates the material was reviewed internally, yet no one took the time to provide even a short response, feedback, or a final decision.
From a candidate’s perspective, it felt like a substantial amount of engineering work and detailed implementation thinking was extracted during the interview process without proper closure or respect for the time invested.
Technical assessments should evaluate a candidate’s skills, but when they require deep architectural design and detailed explanations, companies should at least provide transparency and follow-up afterward.
Going through four interviews and delivering a full technical production ready solution only to receive complete silence left a very negative impression.