The interview process had 5 rounds: Recruiter screen, Coding 1 (DSA), Coding 2 (Code Design), Leadership, Values Firstly the process - very well organised and transparent. The recruiter shared a lot of information related to the expectations before each round and the feedback after each round was provided within a reasonable time window. Coding rounds - IMHO there was very little difference between both of them, the Code Design was very similar to DSA round, with just a slightly more complex problem. Leadership and Values are both quite weird rounds as for me. Mostly overlapping questions. Feedback: Generally I passed all the rounds with good feedback, however, some comments were somewhat surprising: 1. The Code Design round - scale-up solution was not as elegant as the initial one. Not sure what the elegant solution can be done within a 45 minutes time slot. 2. Leadership and Values - some answers were not explaining the problem in detail, for example the conflict that took place, or similar In the end it took more than 2 weeks after all rounds to get to the offer, and I was downgraded to a Senior role mainly because of the values/leadership feedback. My leadership skills are generally impressive, but not as good for a Principal role. Rejected the offer and accepted a comparable Principal role at a different company.