Ir para o conteúdoIr para a pasta
  • Vagas
  • Empresas
  • Salários
  • Para empresas

      Avance em sua carreira

      Descubra qual pode ser seu salário, conquiste a vaga dos seus sonhos e compartilhe insights de qualidade de vida com sigilo.

      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      Bloomberg

      Empresa engajada

      Sobre
      Avaliações
      Remuneração e benefícios
      Vagas
      Entrevistas
      Entrevistas
      Buscas relacionadas: Avaliações da empresa Bloomberg | Vagas da empresa Bloomberg | Salários da empresa Bloomberg | Benefícios da empresa Bloomberg
      Entrevistas da empresa BloombergEntrevistas do cargo de Senior Software Engineer da empresa BloombergEntrevista da empresa Bloomberg


      Glassdoor

      • Sobre
      • Prêmios
      • Blog
      • Fale conosco

      Empresas

      • Conta gratuita de empresa
      • Área da empresa
      • Blog para empresas

      Informações

      • Ajuda
      • Regras da Comunidade
      • Termos de Uso
      • Privacidade e opções de anúncios
      • Não venda nem compartilhe minhas informações
      • Ferramenta de consentimento de uso de cookies

      Trabalhe conosco

      • Anunciantes
      • Carreiras
      Baixe o aplicativo:

      • Busque por:
      • Empresas
      • Vagas
      • Localizações

      Copyright © 2008-2026. Glassdoor LLC. “Glassdoor”, “Worklife Pro”, “Bowls” e o logotipo do Glassdoor são marcas comerciais pertencentes à Glassdoor LLC.

      Empresas seguidas

      Fique por dentro de todas as oportunidades e dicas internas seguindo as empresas de seus sonhos.

      Buscas de vagas

      Comece a buscar vagas para receber atualizações e recomendações personalizadas.

      Entrevista para Senior Software Engineer

      2 de out. de 2018
      Candidato(a) sigiloso(a) à entrevista
      Nenhuma oferta
      Experiência neutra
      Entrevista fácil

      Candidatura

      O processo levou 3 semanas. Fui entrevistado pela Bloomberg em set. de 2018

      Entrevista

      I applied through a recruiter, they scheduled a telephonic interview in a week. The interview has three parts, about the resume (10-12 min), coding (45 min) and any questions about the company (5 min). The coding part is not hard. However, they are still in old C++ style and the interviewer did not understand C++ 11 syntax (like the new for loop, auto, shared_ptr etc) and when I asked him if I should write using old C++ he asked me not to. However, it is a little frustrating to hear that they are not taking advantage of the new language feature. During the interview, he gave me an impression that he was very happy with my coding and told me that he is happy with my performance. We had a nice discussion as we develop the program. I completed both questions up to his satisfaction, but after a week I got the response from my recruiter that even though they thought that I am a strong candidate, my skill set doesn’t match with the requirement. It was a surprise to me as I am working on the same field using C++ for 19 years, but still, my skill set does not match with their requirement. Maybe he was not happy when I started using new C++ language features.

      Perguntas de entrevista [3]

      Pergunta 1

      Compress a string using a number of the repeated character followed by the actual character. For example, aaassbd should be converted tp 3a2s1b1d.
      Responder à pergunta

      Pergunta 2

      Matrix multiplication (3X3 to 1X3). I forgot the actual logic, but I quickly picked up the logic and wrote the program once he explained the basic logic with a simple example.
      Responder à pergunta

      Pergunta 3

      Time and space complexity of the above functions.
      Responder à pergunta
      1

      Outras avaliações de entrevista de vagas de Senior Software Engineer da empresa Bloomberg

      Entrevista para Senior Software Engineer

      6 de mai. de 2026
      Candidato(a) sigiloso(a) à entrevista
      Nenhuma oferta
      Experiência negativa
      Entrevista difícil

      Candidatura

      Fiz uma entrevista na empresa Bloomberg.

      Entrevista

      Terrible communication. Got passed between 3 different recruiters all of whom gave specific dates for updates and blew past them. Descriptions of what would be covered in the interviews are wholly inaccurate (don’t bother reading the PDF they sent to “prep” you, almost none of it came up in any of the 3 interviews I did with them.) Interviewers themselves were decent but clearly had exact “right” answers they were looking for. What’s the point of a leetcode question where there’s only one way to implement it? What’s the point of a system design interview where you’re having a candidate parse through a complex system that they clearly already know everything about and are just looking for 1-2 EXACT modifications to check off their boxes? Was there even a right answer? I genuinely don’t know what this company was looking for. Waste of time, waste of effort, waste of resources. Avoid, avoid, avoid

      Entrevista para Sr. Software Engineer

      21 de abr. de 2026
      Candidato(a) sigiloso(a) à entrevista
      New York, NY
      Nenhuma oferta
      Experiência positiva
      Entrevista com nível médio de dificuldade

      Candidatura

      Fiz uma entrevista na empresa Bloomberg (New York, NY).

      Entrevista

      Interviewed with two separate teams. Coding rounds. Leet code style question. The interview went on for 1 hr. Waiting for the next steps. The seem to like link lists and arrays

      Entrevista para Senior Software Engineer

      14 de mai. de 2026
      Candidato(a) sigiloso(a) à entrevista
      Nenhuma oferta
      Experiência negativa
      Entrevista difícil

      Candidatura

      Candidatei-me de outra forma. Fui entrevistado pela Bloomberg em abr. de 2026

      Entrevista

      Drawn out / repetitive / redundant, overly focused on algorithms you won't use, matches candidates with teams that don't need them. I started interviewing with 2 teams per their process, passed one and failed the other. The team I passed with then filled their role, so they had me interview with a 3rd team but had me start over from first round. I pass this AGAIN (so, to be clear, I've passed 2 out of 3 first rounds with 3 different teams), and then they have me do 2 second round interviews. I made clear I had a lot of client-side experience with a high degree of skill in interface engineering and client architecture. The system design interview asked me basically to "build whatsapp," which is a backend distributed architecture problem. They weren't checking that I knew how a REST api works - they wanted to know about database redundancy with sharding and partitioning and so on, interservice data format pros and cons, message broker queue latency, scaling all these backend things....like, it was not basic stuff. They clearly wanted a distributed systems expert, and of course declined to move forward with my candidacy. With this being the final result of 5 interviews, I expressed that I felt I was matched with the wrong team and received no reply. Kind of feel like my time was wasted. Also, a portion of people I spoke with had no personality or warmth whatsoever.

      Perguntas de entrevista [1]

      Pergunta 1

      Build whatsapp from a system design perspective.
      Responder à pergunta
      1