Four rounds:
First round is a video call with the recruiter.
Second round is a video call with a manager and HR.
Third round are personality tests.
Fourth round is a presentation to the SVP and a manager + recruiter.
Perguntas de entrevista [1]
Pergunta 1
Describe your consulting experience at your prior employer?
Round 1: Phone screen with HR. Straightforward.
Round 2: IQ test and personality test
Round 3: interview with 2 members of the consulting team. Mostly questions about your past experience and capacity to work with data sets.
Round 4: case study/presentation with handful of members from consulting team
Round 5: final interview with 1-2 consultants, likely a VP
Perguntas de entrevista [1]
Pergunta 1
What is your experience working with large data sets?
How do you approach analysis?
Candidatei-me online. O processo levou 1 semana. Fui entrevistado pela CMSPI em ago. de 2024
Entrevista
The whole interview process was a red flag which is why I removed myself from it. There was first a video interview with the recruiter which was straightforward and easy. However, I was then told that I would have to take a personality test (which they claimed was not used in the decision making) and a cognitive test. After that, an interview (or two) with team members and managers. THEN, an in-person presentation of a case study.
First of all, I have interviewed and gotten offers from better more well-known, established companies for similar and or better roles, and did not have a long drawn out process like this one. In fact, I have had 1 maybe 2 rounds of interviews for more appealing jobs with better benefits. The process is usually quick because jobseekers are not trying to have to jump through hoops and hurdles for a subpar job that is not even offering as much as other companies (who are doing a lot less in their interview process btw), just to be rejected at the last round after weeks. As a former recruiter, I know interview processes like this turn off jobseekers with more people likely to dropout at any point of the tedious process. Interview processes like this is also a sign of a toxic workplace/culture in my opinion.
My second problem was the cognitive test. I understand taking technical assessments to assess your skills. But cognitive tests (like the one I had to take) are extremely problematic to use in the job process and are not indicators of my ability to actually do the job. This was 12 minutes to answer as many of the 50 trick questions as you could. In my opinion this was one of those tests that test whether or not you're a good test taker and they used the results to determine whether or not you are eligible for the job. At this point I realized that the job was not worth all of this and there were other companies I had interviews for that I would rather spend my time and energy on. As a jobseeker, it is important to remember that this stuff is a two-way street and you are also evaluating whether or not a company is the right fit for you.