TLDR Overall, the experience with Coda Payments left me questioning their organizational culture and hiring practices. While they may have interesting opportunities, the lack of transparency, unprepared interviewers, and the exclusionary approach to their process make it difficult to recommend pursuing a role with them. Candidates should weigh these factors carefully and research extensively before engaging with the company. Detailed review The salary ranges were notably lower than what is standard in the market, which may deter strong candidates. Additionally, there was a lack of transparency throughout the process, leaving me uncertain about the role and expectations at various stages. The interviewers appeared unprepared and disengaged, giving the impression that they were attending the sessions out of obligation rather than genuine interest. Surprisingly, the process involved only engineering managers, which is unusual and could signal a potential lack of trust between managers and individual contributors (ICs). This exclusion of ICs raises concerns about a possible culture of gatekeeping or segregation within teams. The managers I interacted with seemed defensive and were narrowly focused on their internal perspective, making it difficult to discuss business problems in broader contexts. This approach, coupled with an apparent disinterest in learning about candidates, felt dismissive. The emphasis on repeatedly asserting the company's merits instead of fostering meaningful dialogue was off-putting. My interactions during the process and external reviews from current and former employees suggest potential issues within the company. Several other reviews highlight challenges with management, internal politics, and a lack of inclusivity. These concerns were evident in my own experience, where the communication style and behavior of the interviewers reflected some of these underlying issues. Red Flags One of the most unsettling aspects of the process was a perceived focus on collecting market data under the guise of candidate evaluation. Questions around compensation preferences felt less about understanding fit and more about benchmarking against competitors. Additionally, the recruitment team seemed to prioritize image-building over candidate experience, which came across as disingenuous. As other reviews suggest, avoid this company, there are many better jobs out there