Great technical process, but vague and confusing behavioral round. Pros: - The HR team is highly professional, responsive, and provides crystal-clear communication throughout the process. - The technical interview (live coding/system design) was objective and professional. The tasks were clear and focused on real-world engineering challenges rather than "leetcoding." - Their own interview platform is smooth and intuitive to use. Cons: - Many questions during the behaviour interview were poorly structured and abstract. I had to ask for clarification multiple times just to understand the intent behind the question. - During the behavioral round, there was an strong focus on management scenarios (e.g., how to handle a colleague's lack of progress) rather than technical leadership or architecture. It felt more like an interview for a Project Manager or Team Lead role. - Despite passing the technical assessment, the final decision seemed to be based on "cultural fit" interpreted through the lens of specific management-style answers, which was frustrating given the seniority of the engineering position. The behavioral round needs better structure.