I had one interview with a recruiter (30 mins), one with the hiring manager (30 mins) and then three others with team members on the team (1.5 hours). The last set included two peers and then a member of the team that I would have managed. I selected Neutral and not Approve only because there was no feedback provided by the recruiter and I had to follow up on an answer.

What started out as an exciting conversation ended up being a disorganised and disappointing process that dragged out over 2+ months. Some key issues: - After 7 conversations with CEO, CCO, etc. they were not willing to provide any feedback to me "for legal reasons". A follow-up to find an alternative solution to this was simply ignored by them - The interview process changed multiple times while I was interviewing. After each conversation I was simply forwarded to the next person - I would receive no context around the focus of the next conversation outside of the person's title - Multiple deadlines for feedback set by them were not kept and I had to follow-up myself - The conversation with the recruiter to figure out the basics (start date, salary expectations, etc.) happened as the last step in the process. - Asks around providing me with a budget for the role were ignored/ turned around to me. The last time I asked the answer was "We do not have an exact budget for the role" Other - minor - issues: - Most of the interviews did not start on time. The delays were not much (3-5 mins each), but it was a pattern with the interviewers - All their team members sit in different timezones and they leave scheduling to you. So each time you have figure out their timezone, send over time slots via email, etc. Not a major issue, but something that could be solved more elegantly via any booking platform