I went through 1st round of Dot Net Developer .Interview questions were from SOLID Principles, explain them thoroughly,DI,Basic SQL Queries like getting 2nd highest salary and another which uses Partition By. I answered all of them accurately. Interview went awesome as i explained thoroughly all of them, still got a rejection mail.Can't say what was expected in answer.Anyway i was not going to join the firm after checking reviews on glassdoor, so getting rejected didn't impact much. Only i was shocked what else is expected from the candidate even if 90 % of answers are accurate.

The interview process was of 3 rounds. The first round was from HR about the basic discussion. The second round was for technical debate about Ruby on Rails and its development experience. The technical discussion was broken into OOPS, Ruby, and in-depth questions about Rails in depth separate questions on each topic.

I had one of the most disappointing experiences of my IT career with this company. The interview process was incredibly demotivating and left me feeling undervalued. I participated in three technical rounds, only to be rejected in the final round for reasons that were apparent to the panel from the very first round. This lack of transparency wasted a significant amount of my time and, more importantly, crushed my motivation. The last interview panel was particularly frustrating, as the interviewer seemed focused solely on showcasing their own expertise in a specific skill, rather than fairly evaluating my abilities across the board. Overall, this experience left me questioning the company's approach to candidate assessment and the value they place on potential employees' time and effort. I would advise others to approach opportunities here with caution, they will waste your time at last.