Phone screen with GM Two back to back case interviews Analytics exercise Three back to back behavioral/experience interviews (was rejected after this) Final interview The interview process was overall great contrary to what other reviews say. They seem to actively take steps on feedback received to improve candidate experiences. Pros: Having talked with 5 different people excluding recruiter, everyone excpet the GM seemed engaged, interested, and well prepared. The interviewers were experienced, and the sessions themselves did not seem too formal even when time was limited (mostly 30 minute sessions). Most importantly the people were simply pleasant, and made me excited to potentially work with them. Instead of giving analytics exercise at the screening step, they moved it to after the first round of case interviews. Appreciated this as I knew I had a good chance before committing time to doing the exercise. Perhaps most important to making me feel like a valued candidate, they even scheduled a feedback session after the rejection for to answer questions and review your performance. Lastly, they were timely with follow ups, and scheduling was easy and automatic although the time zones were quite different. Cons: The GM seemed disinterested/bored and was rapid firing one question after another with a disagreeable tone both times I met with him. Felt like I was simply answering a machine's question rather than engaging with a human being. Was late 10 minutes first time, then 5 minutes second time. The analytics exercise takes time. It's kept open ended so you don't know how much time to spend on it, where to spend time (analysis vs presentation), better for them to time box it or limit the scope.

Stardard at first - manager call, case study, etc. Final rounds were bizzare - the recruiter provided actively unhelpful information and questions were incredibly specific for a generalist role (think Amazon-style "tell me about a time when..." but with no associated leadership principles)