Clear communication: The detailed schedule and consistent communication throughout the process were very helpful, setting a positive tone for the entire experience. Thoughtful questions and engaging discussions: The conversations with faculty were intellectually stimulating and allowed for a rich exchange of ideas about research, teaching philosophy, and potential contributions to the department. Opportunity to meet with graduate students: This provided valuable insights into the student experience and the overall departmental culture, which was a significant factor in the decision to apply. The department's professionalism and collegiality were impressive, reflecting a strong and supportive academic environment.

The interview was in 2 rounds and both online (Zoom). 1st round with internal panel with faculty and HOD. Self intro for 2-3 mins, ppt for 12-15 minutes and 10-15 mins of Q&A. Technical questions on subject by subject expert faculty. Confirmation of selection mail received in 3 - 4 days with request to submit a bunch of documents - edu, exp, aadhar, etc. along with one RECOMMENDATION LETTER which was surprising. A ppt on research or any topic of your choice. I prepared on my favorite and contemporary topic. Round 2 with panel containing senior professors (only names revealed but not known from which institution or University) one of them mostly faceless on screen most of the time. again 2-3 mins of self intro, 10 mins of ppt presentation and 8-10 mins of Q&A. Questions were technical but the profs insisted on textual words instead of explaining the concept in own words. if you are in, would receive mail in a week max, else, you will not get response.