Candidatei-me online. Fiz uma entrevista na empresa Huntress.
Entrevista
The first three rounds with the immediate team were excellent—highly collaborative, deeply technical, and perfectly aligned with the role. However, the final round with a newly hired Director felt entirely disconnected from this standard.
The interviewer had joined the company only a week prior and maintained a consistently dismissive tone. Early in the process, the recruiter had emphasized that the company's culture strictly vets against arrogant or negative personalities, but this interaction stood in sharp contrast to that promise. For example, when I asked a standard rapport-building question about how she was enjoying her initial experience at the company, she responded abruptly that she had only been there a week and wouldn't know, accompanied by visibly unprofessional non-verbal cues in annoyance (rolling her eyes and turning away).
Throughout the conversation, she appeared unfamiliar with the technical nuances of the tool we were discussing, yet evaluated my responses with a high degree of subjectivity. For a company looking to safeguard its culture and ensure a fair candidate experience, I highly recommend implementing an objective technical assessment (like a sandbox or a structured Excel project) for final rounds, rather than relying on highly subjective interviews led by individuals who are not yet fully onboarded or familiar with the platform.
Specific note to mgmt: I am writing this as a way for the company to genuinely care for their culture, values, and image. I grew up with my own small family business and find these critiques extremely important for growth and stay indifferent. However, this is a concern as it is due to a recent new hire pushing away highly qualified individuals due to subjective standards and lack of knowledge. Some call this a power trip that I'm also very familiar with in my work experience. It's unfortunately common, however, this is a new hire and will escalate and turn into a snowball effect.
Perguntas de entrevista [1]
Pergunta 1
First couple interviews is generally :Tell me about your work.
Final interviewer question that wasn't presented clearly and unnecessarily wordy and convoluted was something like: If you had to create a plan, how would you do it?
Interview process is straight forward but each interview is very long. Rather than 60 minutes they add an extra 15 minutes.
I applied twice. First time my interview was cancelled because I did this forbidden thing that I applied to 2 positions within the company so they cancelled last minute and rejected me for both the positions. The second time made it through interview process but they didn’t have an opening and was ghosted after. It’s a good company but they are more inclined hiring analyst internationally than in the US.
Imagine finding another amazing opportunity where you felt like you had the attention of a company you felt you to be a great fit for, and being asked to schedule an interview. You got excited, you got prepared, you took the time to really practice your points and that things would look up. The day of the interview, you get a calendar cancellation and a rejection email saying the job was filled, without anyone having said one word to you.
How's that for an interview process?
2
As melhores empresas na categoria “Remuneração e benefícios” perto de você