I recently went through an incredibly maddening interview process that spanned seven weeks and involved a total of six interviews. The process began with an initial conversation with the company recruiter, followed by interviews with the VP of the West Coast and the hiring manager based in Denver. After these interviews, there was an interim call for clarification, which seemed unnecessary given the prior discussions. This was followed by interviews with two property managers, one in Florida and another in California.
During this lengthy process, I took the opportunity to reach out to former employees who had worked with the industrial team. While they all had wonderful things to say about JLL, they also mentioned that, during their 18 months at the company, they saw ten different people in this role. This raised concerns about stability and management within the team. Additionally, I learned that the team is micromanaged, with restrictions in place that even prevent employees from reading their emails during conversations. This environment may not foster the autonomy and trust that many professionals seek.
Although I appreciated the chance to meet various team members, the overall process felt chaotic, with inconsistent scheduling and a lack of clear communication regarding the next steps. Some interviewers seemed unprepared, which left me feeling undervalued as a candidate.
Ultimately, after careful consideration, I decided to withdraw my application. What could have been an efficient hiring process turned into a frustrating experience marked by disorganization, confusion, and increasing doubts about the role's stability. I would advise others to thoroughly check references for the company you are interviewing with.
