Coding assessment was a simple program to parse and do some processing a file/data set. I tried not to spend too much time on it (about a day) but I separated the different stages of the processing "pipeline" into their own modules with interfaces between them, unit and integration testing, no dependencies. Initially they liked my solution and moved me forward to the behavioral interview which was 2 engineering managers drilling me with "tell me a time you..." with follow ups ("what did you learn from that", "describe X tech you used"). I'm not sure why, but from the get-go the two managers definitely didn't want me to be there. Felt like a bad date. It ended and I got rejected with a "actually your coding assessment solution was bad" email.

HR interview Behavioral Interview Tech/coding review Like other experiences here - the coding interview was a little confusing. On one hand I need to work on verbally explaining my code - it’s fair if I got knocked out for that. OTOH the senior level programmer seemed really impatient when I needed clarification on how he wanted me to change my application. I began one approach and he cut me off. It seemed also there was an expectation the code would have unit tests? They gave us 2 hours! The code problem is 100% google-able. Company should supply example data - the one thing I googled up and used. Company should clarify expectations during the code review. I think an actual discussion would work better then an awkward presentation with commands thrown in. Fwiw - I generally got good vibes from the company.