Candidatei-me online. O processo levou 4 meses. Fui entrevistado pela Magic Leap (Miami, FL) em mar. de 2015
Entrevista
The process was pretty typical-- a basic phone screen, followed by Google hang-out calls, then an on-site interview day. At least one of those video calls was a "code test" where an engineer sent some code and you had to modify the code and tell what parts did. During that interview two descriptions were sent, a code had to be written to match the requirements. Is was basic string manipulations, so not too hard from a coding perspective, but the interviewer would watch and ask questions as you talked through your process.
Perguntas de entrevista [1]
Pergunta 1
What are your strengths/weaknesses? Tell me about a time you had to work with a team. How would you change this code snippet? Why are you interested in working here?
O processo levou 2 semanas. Fui entrevistado pela Magic Leap (Orlando, FL) em jul. de 2023
Entrevista
The job is ask for remote. After I schedule time for 4 rounds and finally meet with hiring manager. He them told me he's actually looking for someone on site but the recruiter pushing him to include remote candidate as well
Candidatei-me online. O processo levou 4 semanas. Fui entrevistado pela Magic Leap (Toronto, ON) em out. de 2021
Entrevista
I had interviewed for a senior engineer position on the Browser team. My interview experience started off great. The initial conversation with the recruiter was good. I then had an excellent conversation with the hiring manager who demonstrated passion for the company and successfully sold me on the role. Following this, I had a first round technical interview with a senior engineer on the team. This is unfortunately where the story goes downhill.
My technical interviewer showed up 20 minutes late to the interview. While waiting for the interviewer to arrive, I reached out to both the schedule coordinator and the interviewer but got no response from any of them.
Other than this lateness, the interview went really well. I was asked some basic C++ questions and was given a medium difficulty (as per leetcode) dynamic programming question to solve, which I finished in about 20-25 minutes. After the technical evaluation, I had a wonderful chat with the interviewer and learned a lot about the day-to-day parts of the job. We went well overtime. I left the interview feeling like I had done a great job and happy to hear more about the job.
Two days later, the recruiter told me that based on my technical interview unfortunately they had decided to move on with other candidates, giving the vague reason that my experience did not meet all of the requirements for the position. What was most disappointing to me however was that the recruiter invited me to write back if I had any questions or concerns about their decision to reject my application, and so I took up the offer. However I got no response. This is disappointing and reflects poorly on the company.
Perguntas de entrevista [1]
Pergunta 1
1. C++: When should you mark a destructor as virtual?
2. C++: What is your view on exceptions in C++?
3. Medium/hard dynamic programming question loosely based on leetcode .
Candidatei-me online. Fui entrevistado pela Magic Leap (Miami, FL) em abr. de 2021
Entrevista
Smooth and professional interview over Google Hangouts with an engineering team. Very friendly, good technical questions. Actually can't share a lot about the project because some information is under NDA.
Perguntas de entrevista [1]
Pergunta 1
Q: How do you write a Linux driver if you need to?
