Perguntas de entrevista de vagas de Sr. Software Engineer da empresa Meta
Atualizado em 6 de jun. de 2026
com base em 271 classificações
Dificuldade
Média
Experiência
Predominantemente positiva
Como as pessoas conseguiram uma entrevista?
54%
Recrutador(a)
Recrutador(a)
29%
Candidatura online
Candidatura online
10%
Indicação de funcionários
Indicação de funcionários
4%
Outro
Outro
2%
Agência de recrutamento
Agência de recrutamento
1%
Pessoalmente
Pessoalmente
Busca de entrevistas
271 entrevistas
Mostrando 1 a 5 de 271 entrevistas
Perguntas frequentes de entrevistas da empresa Meta
Candidatos do cargo de Sr. Software Engineer classificaram o processo de entrevista da empresa Meta com 4 de 5 (no qual 5 é o maior nível de dificuldade) e a experiência da entrevista como 100% positiva. Para fins de comparação, a média da empresa é 67% positiva, segundo as classificações de usuários do Glassdoor.
O processo de contratação do cargo de Sr. Software Engineer dura, em média, 14 dias, segundo 2 entrevistas enviadas por usuários relacionadas a esse cargo. Para fins de comparação, o processo de contratação da empresa Meta em geral dura, em média, 43 dias.
De acordo com 2 entrevistas adicionadas ao Glassdoor, as etapas comuns do processo de entrevista do cargo de Sr. Software Engineer da empresa Meta incluem:
Entrevista por telefone: 67%
Teste de habilidades: 33%
Confira os cargos mais buscados para relatórios de entrevistas:
The technical round kicked off with a system design question about creating an Instagram-style social feed. It felt manageable, with a clear flow to my ideas. After that, I faced a maze-solving question that tested my problem-solving skills. What helped me prepare were the system design resources on prachub.com; I had really focused on those, and it felt relevant. Overall, the process was straightforward, but I didn't receive an offer, which was disappointing.
Candidatei-me online. O processo levou 4 semanas. Fui entrevistado pela Meta (Menlo Park, CA) em out. de 2025
Entrevista
2 medium tree Leetcode style question for technical round
virtual onsite:
2 speed coding rounds. medium leetcodes each. - went well
1 behavioral - went well
1 system design - Was a type of topK leaderboard.
Interviewer had a thick accent. couldn't understand the question at all for 20 mins or so. I asked him to write down the question for me to understand clearly but He refused. but anyways this was a no hire.
Fiz uma entrevista na empresa Meta (Menlo Park, CA).
Entrevista
I went through Meta's full interview loop for an E5/E6 Software Engineer role. The process included the standard four-round onsite: two coding rounds, a system design round, a behavioral round, and an AI coding round that Meta has added to their loop. I prepared extensively for each stage — grinding LeetCode-style problems for the coding rounds, building a library of system design references, and writing out STAR-format behavioral answers calibrated to Meta's E5/E6 expectations, drawing on my Oracle Cloud Infrastructure work across the Multicloud Observability team (control plane unification, data plane migration to Oracle Managed Kubernetes, and the Oracle Database at AWS buildout).
Ultimately, I received a rejection with a one-year cooldown before I can reapply.
Looking back honestly, a few weaknesses stood out:
Coding execution under time pressure. While I could solve the problems, I wasn't always optimal on the first pass. I spent time re-deriving approaches instead of pattern-matching quickly, which cost me on the second problem in at least one round.
System design depth vs. breadth tradeoff. My background is deep in cloud infrastructure and observability, so when the design prompt pulled toward consumer-scale product systems (feed ranking, social graph type problems), I leaned on general principles rather than Meta-specific intuition. I covered the fundamentals but didn't always drive the conversation into the nuanced tradeoffs interviewers wanted to hear.
Behavioral calibration to Meta scale. My STAR stories were strong on technical substance, but a few of my impact framings were sized for Oracle's context rather than translated into the scale and cross-org influence language Meta's bar expects at E5/E6.
AI coding round unfamiliarity. This was a newer format for me and I hadn't practiced it as deliberately as the traditional rounds, so my workflow with the AI tooling wasn't as fluid as it could have been.
The cooldown gives me a clear runway to address each of these before reapplying.
As melhores empresas na categoria “Remuneração e benefícios” perto de você