First round is an 'IQ' TEST which is basically an aptitude test . Second is a set of 2 case studies of which you maybe asked to write a RFP . The other case studies has questions which is basically a set of features and components to be specified for a new project for an e-commerce industry healthcare or aviation. Post this - your answers will be evaluated by the interviewer The organization or atleast the person who interviewed inclined towards waterfall model and didn't know Agile well so all answers should be according to waterfall model. Do not talk of anything technical as they believe what they have implemented is the only solution.

Hiring process was smooth but the recruiter probably had no idea of what they were looking for. I was called the very next day I was referred by an employee. I was invited for a super day in which I was supposed to write an aptitude test, write proposal for a RFP and answer questions on a case study. Overall all this took more than 3 hours of continuous writing. Then came the interviewer who seemed pleasant at first and showed very positive vibes. He agreed with me on almost what I said and appeared to understand. I had a feeling that I nailed it when immediately the HR came in to inform that the feedback was not positive. I was shocked so I asked why would that be and believe it or not, they told me that my "profile" was missing what they were looking for and that they were looking for something more than what's on my resume ( did they even read my resume ??) Surprisingly, I had had these question both from the HR and the interviewer beforehand so I could base my answers according to their requirement, but they had no idea what they wanted. A waste of time and energy. Nevertheless , I hope I'll be able to use the hard prep I did to get into a much better company which values people's time and do not make a joke of the recruitment process.