Candidatei-me online. Fui entrevistado pela New Relic em out. de 2024
Entrevista
After submitting my application I was asked to join a phone screen, sandard topics of conversation there (salary expectations, etc.). The second step was a technical interview. I met with three separate engineers.
Perguntas de entrevista [1]
Pergunta 1
Write a recursive b-tree traversal algorithm counting every Nth number in the Fibinacci sequence. I did not succeed.
Candidatei-me online. O processo levou 1 dia. Fiz uma entrevista na empresa New Relic.
Entrevista
Had good coding conversation, thought process was clearly articulated and penned down clearly. In this age, if someone is still looking for syntax, symantics, it shows lack of technology adoption in the mindset and is stuck in oldschool. It didn't move forward, but sure there are no red flags. Not sure why there is rejection, interviewer doesn't seem to have any clue why he rejected. I had been interviewer, and I know how it bites back (be careful interviewers, look for clarity in thinking, avoid mindset not needed in this advanced tech era, If I remember too much syntax and symantics , I can jump boats continuosly, wont be loyal anywhere. )
Perguntas de entrevista [1]
Pergunta 1
Given API and its response time, just return max, min, average and mode of the api.
Candidatei-me online. O processo levou mais de 1 semana. Fui entrevistado pela New Relic (Hyderābād) em nov. de 2024
Entrevista
Online test comprising of MCQ and coding. System design round and finally coding round.
I dont understand why some companies/ panels still rely so much on old school methods of interviewing where a problem from leetcode has to match their known solution otherwise you are rejected. It seems cramming has become the norm now and mediocrity is appreciated
