Candidatei-me online. O processo levou 1 semana. Fui entrevistado pela Nutanix (San Jose, CA) em jan. de 2020
Entrevista
I was given 2 online coding questions and 90 mins to solve them both. They required access to my webcam and my screen. If I tried to open a new window a warning screen popped up telling me the test would end unless I closed the new window.
Perguntas de entrevista [1]
Pergunta 1
Number of ways to group 1's and 0's in an array & array manipulation.
Candidatei-me online. O processo levou 4 meses. Fui entrevistado pela Nutanix (San Jose, CA) em jan. de 2020
Entrevista
Took the online assignment, one round of phone interview on glider, and went onsite in San Jose headquarter. The team were busy with other stuff, so I waited for almost 2 month to get the offer.
Candidatei-me online. Fui entrevistado pela Nutanix em out. de 2019
Entrevista
I got a challenge from glider.ai. It was a standard 90-minute, 2 question coding challenge. In the second question the starter code implemented the parsing of the input correctly. I switched tabs to google something in order to fix the starter code, then I was disqualified because I switched tabs. I understand that there have to be measures to enforce no cheating happens, but the quality/clarity of the questions and starter code was pathetic.
Perguntas de entrevista [1]
Pergunta 1
Basically it was how to find a cycle in an undirected graph. The problem specification was wildly vague and inconsistent. They used the term "loop" in the description and the term "cycle" in the starter code. The description also implied that two nodes can make a "loop", which is definitely not true. Again, this coding challenge was laughably bad and glider.ai needs to get their act together.