4 Stage interview process, got only to the third stage. 1. HR discussion 2. Technical Test 3. Technical Interview (reviewing the technical test, extra cyber or general technical based questions and a challenge) 4. Cybersecurity Hiring manager interview (culture, fit with the company) The technical interview was not easy but challenging and interesting so I put the effort to create a detailed report. (3-5 days deadline) That report was what it seems to be glanced over and the actual interview was relating to other or sort of related to the parts of the report but generic. (2 actual questions regarding the work, which is fine) What was disappointing was that I was not informed that 3 people would join, was made to think that only one guy would be present for the last interview. Two of the people were just watching mostly and that made me uncomfortable. (Actual interviewer was nice overall, even though some questions were a bit unclear) I did mess up some questions that i easily knew because I of this. I can't claim I was perfect but what I am trying to say is that it is in the benefit of both the candidate and the interviewer to make the process clear and transparent, and put more effort in making the interview less tense. I would have liked to have a positive review for Revolut but the last interview and process left me with a bitter-sweet feeling. (And not because of the rejection)