1. screening interview with HR
2. home task - it consisted of 2 parts:
a. a few algorithm exercises via hackerrank
b. implementing a UI based on a provided mockup in figma
i only received feedback on one part of the home task, nothing about the hackerrank exercises. the feedback about the figma project implementation was very strange:
i used a 3rd-party library to validate numbers. to the reviewer this was a negative point. in reality, good engineers use battle tested libraries for such tasks, instead of hacking a custom solution, which is guaranteed to be buggy and miss edge cases.
i took a shortcut of using two font types instead of the 3 (IIRC) provided. in the description i explained why i took this shortcut and why it wouldn't matter in a real project. to the reviewer, this was taken as a negative point.
i added extensive tests but this was not taken as a positive. the reviewer mentioned my tests were "basic", without explaining why they thought so.
responsive design was rated as "okay" without further explanation. in my opinion, i implemented the mobile UI exactly as in the mock.