Candidatei-me online. O processo levou 4 semanas. Fui entrevistado pela Two Sigma (New York, NY) em out. de 2018
Entrevista
First rounds were not bad, but on-site was a pain. Well organized but didn't provide a lot of feedback. Definitely liked the recruiters and the folks I interviewed with. Would certainly consider applying again.
Perguntas de entrevista [1]
Pergunta 1
How do you work with engineers? Explain some challenging projects you've worked on.
Candidatei-me online. O processo levou 3 semanas. Fiz uma entrevista na empresa Two Sigma (New York, NY).
Entrevista
The interview process was short & ended after two rounds of 50 minute calls with PMs. These were generic & not matched to the specific team yet. Would consider interviewing again
Candidatei-me online. O processo levou 6 semanas. Fui entrevistado pela Two Sigma em jan. de 2022
Entrevista
HR screen -> Behavioral/case with a single PM -> "Onsite" with multiple interviewers and mini-cases.
The interviews all went great and then I got dinged with no explanation. Basically a waste of time. The information on how the process would be run was not particularly clear either.
Perguntas de entrevista [1]
Pergunta 1
What are some technical projects you worked on?
How would you source data for X product
Candidatei-me online. O processo levou 4 semanas. Fui entrevistado pela Two Sigma (New York, NY) em jun. de 2023
Entrevista
1. Initial Phone Screen 2. 45 min chat with 1 product manager. Asking general background questions about career, why twosigma, etc. As well as an overview of the P&E org 3. Final round consisting of 5 1 hour long interviews, 1 engineering leader, 2 product mangers, 1 client side / experience manager and 1 quant engineer. This seemed extremely disorganized as all 5 interviewee's asked variations of the exact same questions as the previous interviewer (including from the prior round). I felt like I was giving repetitive answers for all five interviews. Everyone was polite and respectful and most interviewers did seem engaged. All in all, spending nearly 6 hours evaluating a candidate especially when there doesn't seem to be a goal with any particular interview (each person is just giving feedback on the same question/answer) seems like a huge waste of time for both parties.
Give an example of when you launched a product from 0-1. How did you recognize the problem you were solving? Describe trade-offs and alternative solutions that you decided against, creative process, how you broke down the problem, how you handed it off to engineering, how did the launch go? What metrics did you use to measure success?
