It was very basic. We pretty much just reviewed my work history. I asked some questions on why the glassdoor ratings were so low and why there was a long term employee exodus. Not a lot of sales based questions to see what my process was, tools I used, or anything that would determine if I could close.
Sales interviews are different from regular interviews and should be a bit more heavy on the digging portion initially.
Didn't make it past the first interview which is hard to grasp because there wasn't any qualification questions. Seems like it was based off his personality assessment of me. Which is fine but you will lose a lot of good sales candidates that way.
Perguntas de entrevista [1]
Pergunta 1
Explain your work history and what got you into marketing sales.
Candidatei-me por meio de recrutador(a). Fui entrevistado pela Victorious em jan. de 2026
Entrevista
Recruiter reached out through LinkedIn several times for a screening call. Had the call, and recruiter was unable to answer questions like "What is your culture like, with being remote?" - especially concerning given the state of the reviews here. Then, two days later, when the recruiter let me know they'd be following up for next steps, they let me know they had already sent an offer letter and someone had accepted. Why would you hunt people down and push a screening call when you have candidates in final stages, and waste everyone's time? No wonder this is what their Glassdoor looks like.
The recruiter reached out via email and laid it on thick stating it was the best decision he's ever made and was filling several positions. Yet, he never furnished the JD, salary range, or asked for my résumé. When I asked about the JD, he said it's on our site. Turns out only one position was listed. Clearly, a canned email he's been using for some time.
It was pretty clear, there's internal politics and I'm sure they knew I was not going to comply with their absurd take home assignment given my experience of ranking systems, LLMs, pitching clients, and doing extensive audits. Companies that need to do this are devoid in a proper process. My question on what their biggest challenge was received a big empty word salad. It was a terrific non-answer. Nothing was said about what they are trying to achieve as a company. Recruiter was nice enough, smiled, but was constantly positioning himself instead of genuinely trying to understand my knowledge and what I bring. Overall, pleasant I suppose, but no substance. The questions were surface level. The perception is that they are behind in transitioning to AI search because it wasn't even mentioned. This company has been in the space for a while but I did not get the sense it's stable. They are probably using terms such as GEO which is snake oil BTW. It's repackaged nonsense. This company struck me more as a stepping stone not one at the forefront of search. Overall, it felt more like the recruiter fulfilling a quota. Therefore, I never bothered to send a thank you letter even though I thought it was a pleasant enough conversation.