Fiz uma entrevista na empresa erthos (Chandler, AZ).
Entrevista
First round was with a recruiter. After that I had two separate 1:1 interviews with technical leadership, followed by a panel interview. The interview was mostly about my experience, but there were also some technical questions. The process wasn’t too difficult, they decided to pass since my background was mainly in chemical engineering.
Candidatei-me online. O processo levou 4 semanas. Fui entrevistado pela erthos (Mississauga, ON) em set. de 2024
Entrevista
The worst interview process, the founders know nothing about ML and the scope of the project. They expect anything and everything from one person and will make you do unnecessary long projects to get ideas and later ghost you or reject you in a "CULTURE FIT" round. They do not respect your time, effort and dedication. Honestly don't even apply here, they have nothing for a platform its just marketing and big words on linkedin, internally they don't have a platform.
Perguntas de entrevista [1]
Pergunta 1
Nothing about AI/ML, because they themselves have no idea.
make sure you "FIT THE CULTURE" because that is what matters
Candidatei-me online. Fiz uma entrevista na empresa erthos.
Entrevista
The lack of respect for a candidate's time and energy speaks volumes about the company’s culture. If a business cannot manage a professional, timely, and respectful interview process, what kind of environment would an employee face after being hired?
The interview process should be a two-way street, allowing both the company and the candidate to evaluate fit. Instead, this company puts candidates through excessive, draining rounds without the courtesy of clear, timely communication. This leaves you wondering about their internal processes and how they treat their employees.
Ultimately, if a company makes you jump through hoops for months only to ghost you or give vague feedback, it’s a red flag for anyone considering working there.
I would strongly advise anyone thinking of applying to reconsider. Your time and energy are valuable, and no role is worth the frustration of dealing with a company that has little regard for the people they’re evaluating.
Perguntas de entrevista [1]
Pergunta 1
The process starts with a simple 30-minute introductory round, followed by lengthy technical assessments that are mentally exhausting—especially if you're not familiar with their specific work. Then, you have to defend the work you've done. If you make it through this, there’s a cultural fit interview.
However, after that, you’re left in the dark. They don’t give you answers or updates right after the rounds. Instead, weeks—and sometimes even months—can pass without any word from them. Following up results in vague responses, if any. Asking for feedback stretches the timeline even further, and sometimes you don’t receive any at all.
The most frustrating part? After all the time and effort, they may finally tell you, “We think you don’t have enough experience for the role.” If that’s the case, couldn’t they have judged this earlier in the process? Why put candidates through such a grueling and time-consuming process of 1 long month, only to end with something that could have been assessed in the initial rounds?
This leaves candidates questioning their own abilities and can lead to a sense of self-doubt or even mental breakdown after being left in limbo for weeks on end.