Candidatei-me online. O processo levou 9 meses. Fui entrevistado pela EY (Londres, Inglaterra) em set. de 2012
Entrevista
1. Online Maths and Reasoning tests, fairly standard for graduate schemes
2. Competency based interview at their London offices questions like:
When have you worked well in a team?
When have you gone above and beyond the call of duty
When has been your greatest achievement?
What has been your biggest challenge and how do oyu overcome it?
How do you diesignate your time?
3. Assessment centre:
First was a group excercise, about different form of green energy and what the company should invest in:
I would say try not to be too dominant in this excercise, they are looking for people who can fit in a team easily. Pay attention to the details and if you have any good points try and make them well known.
Second was the interview with the partner. This was a more in-depth than the competency based interview with the same type of questions "Why ernst and young" etc. This is the person who will eventually decice if you get the job so prepare well and make a very good impression.
Lastly was two psychometic tests. These are identical to the ones which you would have taken online, they just want to see how well you work under pressure.
Overall I would say research the company, research the role, research on websites like this what employers say about the company, sell yourself and be confident!
Il s'agit d'un processus de recrutement en trois temps : un entretien avec un manager, un cas pratique relatif au secteur public avec un directeur, puis un entretien avec un associé.
Candidatei-me por indicação de um funcionário. Fiz uma entrevista na empresa EY.
Entrevista
Comparatively easier compared to other big 4. Typically a 45 mins interview with focus on technical questions. Interviewer mainly checks your technical knowledge and experience based off your previous projects.
Perguntas de entrevista [1]
Pergunta 1
Tell me about a difficult project and how did you handle it? What was your role?
The interview lasted about an hour and was highly technical, covering topics in depth. The detailed discussion suggests genuine interest in evaluating my skills, experience, problem-solving abilities, and overall fit for the role.