The interview process is exactly in line with what is being told by others Round 1 : Initial screening with Recruiter Round 2: Interview with Peer for skill set match Round 3: Interview with Director Round 4: Panel presentation and interview with VP 3 hours long :) It is a long gruelling process however so many things to learn and you feel so much positive at every step about you. Although I did not survive the presentation round but came very close for selection. I went wrong in predicting the time required to develop using mulesoft interfaces. I assumed their assets are robust developed and easy path for integration and development which went wrong. As a delivery manager when I read white papers and so many case studies I felt positive about mulesoft as a platform. Guess I was wrong in my assumption but certainly if this is not the case then so much for Mulesoft to improve and live up to the expectation of contributing to their assets from so many projects developed and integrated and improve the mulesoft platform and make it easier for development and integration. Never the less those were my thoughts and it did not help me to move up. But so many things to learn for both me and Mulesoft. For me, I should not have been so much positive about mulesfot platform and for mulesoft to learn is to mature their product if the implementation is difficult.

About 5 rounds of interviews with management, team members, and an hour presentation to a panel based on a case study. Very long process that took many months, and the presentation took quite a bit of prep.