The recruiter had an engineer reach out to me directly. The phone screen was good - I was asked to write some code and explain how it could be enhanced. I was then called for an on-site interview. I then had 4 interviews with 2 people in each interview. The first one was a coding a design exercise which I did quite well. Neither of the interviewers spoke much. I was quite baffled by their deathly silence. The second one was more of a design and architecture one and this too was good. The 3rd one was with a QA manager and the Director of Engg. At this point, I thought I would be offered lunch. But there was no food in the kitchen. All the director did was get me a couple of cereal bars. The 3rd interview was also a lot of architecture and general CI/CD stuff. The QA manager was busy with his laptop and barely asked a few questions. The 4th interview went downhill fast. The 2 engineers who came in didn't even smile much. Questions centered around TCP/IP layer 4 and other low-level stuff. I'll admit I was a bit taken aback by this and fluffed it. But the questions were really into system-level topics rather than application-level. It almost seemed to be a one-upmanship interview. The 2nd engineer was silent throughout this interview. Most interviewers emphasized that their primary language was Ruby even though the role I was interviewing for didn't need it. My 5th interview for the day didn't happen since the interviewer was out. As another commenter here has noted - their office space is very drab. I have no clue what they did/are doing with the 150million+ in VC funding. It certainly isn't going into the office space. Their "lunch" desk is a long aluminum table right next to the working desks. And yes, a ping-pong table is right next to that lunch table. The kitchen had sandwich wrappers thrown all over the place. I was completely surprised that my 4.5 hour interview didn't include lunch. I am quite glad they didn't proceed with me to the last round.